Selenium IDE is basically used as a prototyping tool and would not be suitable for creating and maintaining complex test suites. Selenium is used for smoke testing verifying critical changes. It also becomes an important tool for unit testing.
Now, being worked on real browsers and interacts with UI based on current existing functionality, Selenium is less preferred than PhantomJS for unit testing.ĭevelopers also preferred PantomJS as code can be written by selecting the HTML element while developing the UI. Unit testing is mainly done by the developers. Although it is not a big issue, sometimes real browsers are required instead of headless browsers. PhantomJS uses QtWebKIt, and that means it is not the same javascript engine that Chrome uses.
So if any needs to be developed on a specific Javascript engine, it can be reached through Selenium. Selenium works on UI and using real browsers. It is basically an optimal solution for Headless Website Testing, access web pages and comes with the standard DOM API. PhantomJS is a headless Web Kit scriptable with a JavaScript API. It supports all major operating systems and browsers like Mozilla, IE and Firefox. Selenium is an open-source automation tool. But this is a bit different in the case of PhantomJS, as it is a headless browser.īelow is the comparison between Selenium and PhantomJS. So, easy to set preconditions for the tests. Selenium works on a real browser and standalone UI interactions.Selenium supports many browsers (cross browsers) and a good platform for future real browsers to Selenium web driver, whereas PhantomJS is a scripted headless browser and doesn’t work on the real browser (UI) interaction.Selenium doesn’t directly support screen capture, and one has to implement add-ins to process the same, whereas PhantomJS supports screen capture.This would not be the case for PhantomJS. Selenium has one component known as Selenium IDE, which one can use the same IDE for coding to debug.So the performance time is smoother in PhantomJS than in Selenium.
The difference between Selenium and PhantomJS is explained in the below-mentioned points: Key Differences Between Selenium and PhantomJS Head to Head Comparison Between Selenium and PhantomJSīelow are the top 7 comparisons of Selenium and PhantomJS: Only serves as a single version of Web Kit No need to integrate with third-party service The IDE recording and performance isn’t too powerful and effectiveīeing headless, the execution is very fast Slow performance while running multiple test cases Not that suitable for running more than a few browsers on one machine at a time The pros and cons are as follows: Selenium ProsĮasy integration with an existing testing frameworkĮasy to debug as the real-time activities are visible
Like the two sides of a coin, these two frameworks also have pros and cons. Selenium has 4 components, such as Selenium IDE, Selenium RC, Selenium Web Driver, and Selenium Grid. Jason Huggins initially developed selenium in 2004. Now, Selenium and PhantomJS are the two equally important and well-known testing frameworks.
It actually goes hand in hand with the Software Development process. Software Testing is the most important procedure while producing any Software product. Web development, programming languages, Software testing & others
Start Your Free Software Development Course